An interpretation of a statement by Albert
Camus
“The evil that is in the world always comes
from ignorance” and those with good intentions may do as much harm as those who
actually desire to do harm to others, if they lack understanding. In general,
men can have a greater tendency to do good than bad; that, however is not the
point of this argument.. Most men are more or less ignorant of an understanding
of the truth of their relationship with others when viewed from the standpoint
of a desired end result of peace and joy during this life time. There are
enormous possibilities available to man kind through an understanding of the
true possibility of brotherhood of man and his empathic relationship to nature
in a gestalt of peaceful coexistence, mutual respect, and continuing
enlargement of the soul. Albert calls this understanding, Personal
Enlightenment. Personal Enlightenment is the process of developing a clearer
view, to instruct oneself so he may see and comprehend truth, free from
ignorance, prejudice and superstition.
The relative ignorance of men is what we call
vice and virtue; the most difficult vice to change is ignorance. That ignorance
that believes it knows the whole truth and then believes it has a divine right
of power over others. All too often the soul of the self claimed righteous is
blind. But, there can be no true righteousness, nor love without the utmost
clear sightedness.
Believe those who are
searching for the truth.
Doubt those who find
it.
--Andre Gide
Since man is not born with the knowledge and
reinforcing experience to have understanding, he must set out on a life long
adventure in learning. All too often his information inputs are limited to
those from within his immediate environment. He undertakes little or no
initiative on his own to search for knowledge and experience that will give him
greater understanding than his immediate culture already claims to have. All
too often this data base is extremely limited compared to the accumulated knowledge
of mankind and the injection of new ideas from the out side is looked upon with
great suspect. Often inherited ideas are never tested by the individual but are
taken for granted because the local power structure has declared them. “You
don’t need to think about these things because WE have done this for you”. A challenge to the doctrine of the
hierarchy is a challenge to their power and authority. It is difficult for the
orthodoxy/institution to exist when the cultural data base is changing and growing
and there is an unrelenting flow of information from the outside. The “Arab
Spring” of 2011 is a great example of this. The free flow of information
enabled by the World Wide Web could be a great force for fighting ignorance,
but it can also be an amazing propaganda tool.
No comments:
Post a Comment